←back to thread

259 points the-mitr | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.309s | source
Show context
sieve ◴[] No.45049013[source]
I don't know why they decided to pause uploads. Relying on Indian courts for sensible and timely judgments will only lead to grief. They do not respect precedence and judgements often depend on the judge and the people involved rather than the facts of the case.

What happened in University of Oxford v. Rameshwari Photocopy Service is pretty rare.[1] I doubt if we will see a repeat of that one.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Oxford_v._Ramesh...

replies(5): >>45049337 #>>45049685 #>>45049867 #>>45050533 #>>45057643 #
A_D_E_P_T ◴[] No.45049867[source]
> They do not respect precedence

This is tangential, but deference to precedent has become a huge problem in US and UK Commmon Law. So much case law has built up over the centuries that you can find a precedent to support almost any position! The "legal research" battle -- like the "discovery" battle -- just adds tremendous time, expense, and complexity, and rarely or indeed almost never benefits the litigants or the court.

replies(5): >>45049968 #>>45050132 #>>45050137 #>>45050152 #>>45053826 #
1. j45 ◴[] No.45050132[source]
Precedence should be one consideration, like context, and maybe not too much interpretation or opinion.