> And because we're part of the organization suing Mississippi over it, and were explicitly named in the now-overturned preliminary injunction, we think the risk of the state deciding to engage in retaliatory prosecution while the full legal challenge continues to work its way through the courts is a lot higher than we're comfortable with
Since you can't really block all state IPs, but also since prosecution isn't bound by honesty, this retaliatory risk doesn't decrease much (though hard to assess precisely).