←back to thread

The Deletion of Docker.io/Bitnami

(community.broadcom.com)
329 points zdkaster | 1 comments | 28 Aug 25 04:37 UTC | HN request time: 0.203s | source
Show context
rahkiin ◴[28 Aug 25 06:32 UTC] No.45049100[source]▶
It is sad to see how Broadcom cannot do padding right for mobile…

But on topic: why not create docker.io/bsi and let /bitnami as is without new updates? Then nothing breaks; it just won’t be possible to do upgrades. You’ll then figure out why and possibly seamlessly switch to your own build or BSI.

replies(3): >>45049311 #>>45050773 #>>45051041 #
orthoxerox ◴[28 Aug 25 07:06 UTC] No.45049311[source]▶
Because "bitnami" has brand value. It makes business sense to reuse the name for the new service you are trying to sell.
replies(1): >>45049550 #
1. Aeolun ◴[28 Aug 25 07:47 UTC] No.45049550[source]▶
Any brand value that bitnami has will be entirely destroyed by this incomprehensible change. People will associate the ‘bitnami’ namespace with “can’t possible utilize for long term production use”