←back to thread

Unexpected productivity boost of Rust

(lubeno.dev)
517 points bkolobara | 1 comments | 27 Aug 25 15:48 UTC | HN request time: 0.201s | source
Show context
BinaryIgor ◴[27 Aug 25 17:30 UTC] No.45042483[source]▶
Don't most of the benefits just come down to using a statically typed and thus compiled language? Be it Java, Go or C++; TypeScript is trickier, because it compiles to JavaScript and inherits some issues, but it's still fine.

I know that Rust provides some additional compile-time checks because of its stricter type system, but it doesn't come for free - it's harder to learn and arguably to read

replies(17): >>45042692 #>>45043045 #>>45043105 #>>45043148 #>>45043241 #>>45043589 #>>45044559 #>>45045202 #>>45045331 #>>45046496 #>>45047159 #>>45047203 #>>45047415 #>>45048640 #>>45048825 #>>45049254 #>>45050991 #
1. csomar ◴[28 Aug 25 05:44 UTC] No.45048825[source]▶
Yes. What Rust adds is a better type system. Statically typed is as good as your Type system (which is why TypeScript still sucks).

The concurrency/safety/memory story is only valid in a few rare cases and I wish people didn't try to sell Rust for these features.