←back to thread

295 points AndrewDucker | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.421s | source
Show context
andybak ◴[] No.45045278[source]
Between this and the UK Online Safety Bill, how are people meant to keep track?

Launch a small website and commit a felony in 7 states and 13 countries.

I wouldn't have known about the Mississippi bill unless I'd read this. How are we have to know?

replies(9): >>45045295 #>>45045350 #>>45045462 #>>45045802 #>>45047760 #>>45047928 #>>45048091 #>>45050064 #>>45054184 #
1. protocolture ◴[] No.45047928[source]
Its things like this that make me want the internet excluded from all legal systems as extra territorial. There should be no laws governing the internet. Almost uniformly they are stupid. The most success law enforcement gets out of capturing pedos is setting up honeytraps anyway.
replies(2): >>45048010 #>>45048723 #
2. ethbr1 ◴[] No.45048010[source]
"When catapults are outlawed, only outlaws will have catapults."

Welcome back to the 90s and the PGP, Clipper chip, warez, and DeCSS days.

At some point, they will have outlawed enough things that most people want, that most people will become outlaws.

3. IgorPartola ◴[] No.45048723[source]
I would argue privacy laws are good. But I do think laws that apply to the internet in the US should only come at a federal level. That would help with uniformity.