←back to thread

293 points Michelangelo11 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.343s | source
Show context
jWhick ◴[] No.45039645[source]
I'm wondering why these days, when my washing machine has an internet connection, they can't take over control of a plane remotely. I guess it could be considered a security vulnerability, however i'm quite sure it could be done securely. Like let the pilot eject and you try to land a plane with remote control
replies(5): >>45039725 #>>45039737 #>>45039904 #>>45039936 #>>45040096 #
Aurornis ◴[] No.45039936[source]
Going from “I can check my washing machine remotely” to “it should be easy to remotely control fighter jets without any security risks” is quite a leap.

Anyway it’s missing the point. If the pilot can’t adequately control the airplane then a remote operator isn’t going to have a better experience.

replies(1): >>45045372 #
jWhick ◴[] No.45045372[source]
I mean, a remote operator could either try to land it in life risking situation, salvaging some of that $200M, or do kamikaze style on a target, both feel quite useful for war situations.
replies(1): >>45047216 #
1. nradov ◴[] No.45047216[source]
Remote piloting isn't useful for aircraft expected to perform penetrating strike missions against near-peer adversaries. Developing such a capability would be a waste of money.