←back to thread

574 points frays | 8 comments | | HN request time: 0.727s | source | bottom
1. bsenftner ◴[] No.45046483[source]
Next up: super frustrated ex-google PMs complaining "that's not how it's done at Google" at their new jobs.
replies(4): >>45047057 #>>45051317 #>>45055587 #>>45059140 #
2. kylestlb ◴[] No.45047057[source]
This has been happening for over a decade
replies(1): >>45048254 #
3. leoh ◴[] No.45048254[source]
Having worked with said PMs both at Google and after, it is extremely annoying
4. ddoolin ◴[] No.45051317[source]
Working with one of those right now, on my two-person team, ironically.
5. duxup ◴[] No.45055587[source]
Lotta folks out there are heavily invested in "process" to the point that they can't see anything outside process.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bTuLbiIVDpk

replies(1): >>45063054 #
6. stevemk14ebr ◴[] No.45059140[source]
believe it or not the same line is how it works at google too!
7. utyop22 ◴[] No.45063054[source]
Lol I went through a few FAANG Pm interviews for the lols.

Ah trust me - its actually insane how every firm manages to pull this off - the secret sauce that made the company what it was evaporates and the management optimise for process.

replies(1): >>45067102 #
8. duxup ◴[] No.45067102{3}[source]
I kinda get it. Process is something you KNOW you can pull off. Code is ... open for interpretation, anything is posible, lots of unknown.

And it's tempting where you institute processes to prevent "well that won't happen again".

But man process really doesn't really contribute a great deal anyhow.