←back to thread

I Am An AI Hater

(anthonymoser.github.io)
443 points BallsInIt | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.333s | source
Show context
tzumaoli ◴[] No.45045322[source]
It's interesting to see the trend of the attitude towards GenAI in Hacker News through out the years. This is totally vibe based and I don't have numbers to back it up, but back in 2022-2023, the site was dominantly people who mostly treat GenAI as a curious technology without too much attachment, and some non-trivial amount of folks who are very skeptical of the tech. More recently I see a lot more people who see themselves as evangelists and try very hard to boost/advocate the technology (see all the "LLM coding changes my life" posts). It seems that the tide has turned back a little bit again since we now see this kind of posts surfacing.

For me, I kind of wish this site to go back to the good old days where people just share their nerdy niche hacker things and not filling the first page with the same arguments we see on the other parts of the internet over and over again. ; ) But granted I was attracted by the clickbait title too, so I can't blame others.

replies(5): >>45045683 #>>45045701 #>>45046798 #>>45047726 #>>45051815 #
TeMPOraL ◴[] No.45045701[source]
I don't pay much attention to the submission themselves, but I do care what the fellow HN-ers think, and my own "vibe-based" perspective is that the voices have been predominantly negative for many years now, and only grow even more so.
replies(1): >>45046030 #
1. bonoboTP ◴[] No.45046030[source]
HN is usually negative, cynical, skeptical, eyerolling, regardless of topic.

Just the other day someone posted the ImageNet 2012 thread (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4611830), which was basically the threshold moment that kickstarted deep learning for computer vision. Commenters claimed it doesn't prove anything, it's sensational, it's just one challenge with a few teams, etc. Then there is the famous comment when Dropbox was created that it could be replaced by a few shell scripts and an ftp server.

replies(2): >>45048402 #>>45051691 #
2. Matthyze ◴[] No.45048402[source]
Thanks for linking that thread. Really puts things in perspective.
3. AlecSchueler ◴[] No.45051691[source]
My general rule is thumb now is that if HN takes the time to deride it then there's probably something to it, if it gets completely ignored then there's probably not.