←back to thread

Google has eliminated 35% of managers overseeing small teams in past year

(www.cnbc.com)
574 points frays | 1 comments | 27 Aug 25 21:16 UTC | HN request time: 0.222s | source
Show context
mikestew ◴[27 Aug 25 21:52 UTC] No.45045782[source]▶
The 35% reduction refers to the number of managers who oversee fewer than three people, according to a person familiar with the matter.

If you oversee 0-2 people, in most cases that’s probably not an efficient ratio. How did Google get so many folks in that position in the first place? And I assume the other 65% take up the slack to fluff their teams? Or what? Leave the other 65% managing 0-2 people?

replies(16): >>45045800 #>>45045814 #>>45045815 #>>45045827 #>>45045863 #>>45046087 #>>45046207 #>>45046272 #>>45046285 #>>45046335 #>>45046408 #>>45046621 #>>45047565 #>>45047573 #>>45051289 #>>45052082 #
TheBigSalad ◴[27 Aug 25 21:54 UTC] No.45045800[source]▶
How is it not efficient?
replies(3): >>45045873 #>>45045880 #>>45046167 #
1. n1b0m ◴[27 Aug 25 22:00 UTC] No.45045873[source]▶
I guess it depends on what other responsibilities the manager has. If a manager has too little to do, they might over-manage their small team, constantly checking in on their work, which is inefficient and demoralising.