←back to thread

295 points AndrewDucker | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
tick_tock_tick ◴[] No.45044989[source]
How is this vaguely sufficient to meet the legal requirements of the law? They know geo-blocking is insufficient.
replies(5): >>45045138 #>>45045153 #>>45045567 #>>45045920 #>>45048438 #
1. mxuribe ◴[] No.45045153[source]
IANAL, but if the actual legislation did not either recommend or dictate which method would be either good or even considered valid for purposes of enactment of the law, would it then be subject to interpretation?

Also, for the enforcement agency who is/will be tasked with checking things out here...do they know whether geo-blocking is valid method or not? Its a silly law, don't get me wrong...but if its enforcement validation mechanisms are not up to snuff, i wonder how things will play out - both here in dreamwidth's case and other folks in a similar boat?