←back to thread

152 points xqcgrek2 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
Aurornis ◴[] No.45043467[source]
I don’t trust this administration to perform an unbiased investigation, but it’s not a secret that Wikipedia is a high profile target for anyone who wants to push an agenda.

Even trivial topics can attract die-hards who refuse to let an article say something they don’t like.

Wikipedia also seeks to have a similar problem to StackOverflow where some users have become very good at working their way into the site’s structures and saying the right things to leverage the site’s governance model to their advantage. The couple times I’ve visited “talk” pages for topics that seemed a bit off lately I found a whirlwind of activity from a handful of accounts who seemed to find a Wikipedia rule or procedure to shut down talk they disagreed with.

replies(5): >>45043573 #>>45043697 #>>45043887 #>>45043942 #>>45043984 #
Fricken ◴[] No.45043573[source]
It's time to move Wikipedia from the US to a safer haven
replies(4): >>45043742 #>>45043870 #>>45043897 #>>45044085 #
1. nostrademons ◴[] No.45044085[source]
You can just download it:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Database_download

Downloading Wikipedia is usually a first step for people getting involved in prepping or data-hoarding communities, because it's so much easier than most other websites, and the utility you get from it is pretty large. And the downloads, while fairly large, will still fit on a typical home computer. There are probably tens of thousands of copies, if not more, floating around.