←back to thread

House to investigate Wikipedia over allegations of organized bias

(thehill.com)
152 points xqcgrek2 | 3 comments | 27 Aug 25 18:25 UTC | HN request time: 0.425s | source
Show context
righthand ◴[27 Aug 25 18:57 UTC] No.45043566[source]▶
Organized bias like creating a specific page to for a fictional syndrome in order to wave away any criticisms of your opponents. So organized that Wikipedia won’t remove the obvious bs:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump_derangement_syndrome

One of the many reasons I don’t donate to Wikipedia. To keep this page up is to continue fueling unnecessary culture wars. Which in my opinion doesn’t align with their mission as it is not knowlege but an attack:

> Wikipedia's purpose is to benefit readers by presenting information on all branches of knowledge.

replies(4): >>45043603 #>>45043617 #>>45043889 #>>45045313 #
nessbot ◴[27 Aug 25 19:02 UTC] No.45043617[source]▶
I mean it is a "a pejorative term used to describe negative reactions to U.S. President Donald Trump..." How is having a page for that biased. And this is coming from some who has been described in the past (not anymore) of having TDS.
replies(2): >>45043685 #>>45043839 #
righthand ◴[27 Aug 25 19:06 UTC] No.45043685[source]▶
Negative reactions to a US president isn’t exclusive to Trump. Yet here is a page indicating that there is something special about a person not liking a US President named Trump.

Where is the Bush Derangement Syndrome? Where is the Biden Derangement Syndrome? Arguably this page owes everything to Obama Derangement Syndrome.

replies(3): >>45043769 #>>45043835 #>>45044132 #
epgui ◴[27 Aug 25 19:13 UTC] No.45043769[source]▶
Wikipedia is not a source of original research or thinking. If prominent and reputable sources spoke about and coined these other terms there would be articles about them, or the article would be more generic.

Wikipedia exists in the context of the real world. All it does is reflect it. Deal with it.

replies(1): >>45043816 #
1. righthand ◴[27 Aug 25 19:17 UTC] No.45043816[source]▶
I am dealing with it. I am informing people about the crap quality of content on Wikipedia. All I’m doing is reflecting the hypocrisy. You don’t like the fact that I can post my dissent online? Deal with it.
replies(2): >>45043888 #>>45043959 #
2. lovich ◴[27 Aug 25 19:23 UTC] No.45043888[source]▶
You haven’t informed anyone of any such thing. Wikipedia does not generate original concepts on purpose and you are complaining that an equivalent term exists for other presidents. Right now if Wikipedia was to create pages for those terms, _that_ would actually be bias as those terms aren’t widely used/don’t exist and would only be added to meet some people’s concept of “fairness” where if something bad happens to my side something bad has to happen to yours too

Edit: Also as someone else pointed out the page describes the origin of the term as evolving out of Bush Derangement syndrome being coined in 2003 and even comments on a Thatcher Derangement Syndrome phrase used after her death. The Trump Derangement Syndrome appears to be the main article because of the actual usage by government and in legislation

3. Paratoner ◴[27 Aug 25 19:28 UTC] No.45043959[source]▶
This is has to be ragebait by a pathetic troll. You haven't even read the first 4 lines of the page you've linked, where it refutes your argument that "this is specific to Trump". At least work a little on your clown material.