←back to thread

278 points Michelangelo11 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
preisschild ◴[] No.45038390[source]
But why was there water in the hydraulic system in the first place?
replies(4): >>45038480 #>>45038515 #>>45038537 #>>45038678 #
grumpy-de-sre ◴[] No.45038537[source]
Likely contamination of ground handling equipment [1]. Unfortunately can happen. I wonder if the hydraulic fluid is hygroscopic or something?

1. https://www.pacaf.af.mil/Portals/6/documents/3_AIB%20Report....

replies(4): >>45038600 #>>45038679 #>>45039864 #>>45040818 #
HelloNurse ◴[] No.45040818[source]
But what ground handling equipment? Does the hydraulic fluid need to be replaced after normal usage? Any intervention is an opportunity for mishaps, failure and sabotage. I'd expect the unlimited F-35 budget to come up with some formula that resists fire, cold, heat and pressure and doesn't need refills and/or with water detectors and other safety-critical chemical sensors in the hydraulic system.
replies(1): >>45041021 #
1. grumpy-de-sre ◴[] No.45041021[source]
Everything leaks hydraulic fluid, it's just an inherent property of any system with dynamic seals.

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/d3ruv-IsGMo