←back to thread

278 points Michelangelo11 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
yellow_lead ◴[] No.45038691[source]
> Five engineers participated in the call, including a senior software engineer, a flight safety engineer and three specialists in landing gear systems, the report said.

I can't imagine the stress of being on this call as an engineer. It's like a production outage but the consequences are life and death. Of course, the pilot probably felt more stressed.

replies(9): >>45039254 #>>45039282 #>>45039409 #>>45039651 #>>45040107 #>>45040566 #>>45040768 #>>45041007 #>>45044206 #
airstrike ◴[] No.45039409[source]
I don't think there was ever a risk of the plane crashing with the pilot still in the cockpit, despite the fact that the headline sort of leads people to that conclusion.

The pilot could eject at any time. Still dangerous, but more of a debugging session to avoid other similar costly in the future than a Hollywood-like "if we don't solve this now the pilot dies"

replies(4): >>45039579 #>>45039607 #>>45039722 #>>45041508 #
chasil ◴[] No.45039722[source]
I imagine that ejecting at certain phases of these two attempts would not be survivable.

"The pilot then tried two “touch and go” landings, where the plane briefly lands, to try to straighten out the jammed nose gear, the report said."

replies(2): >>45040231 #>>45040602 #
1. the__alchemist ◴[] No.45040602{3}[source]
The main times a "0/0" ejection would be expected to be unsurvivable are going really fast (e.g. breaking the mach), and with some combo of high sink rate and high bank.