←back to thread

F-35 pilot held 50-minute airborne conference call with engineers before crash

(www.cnn.com)
279 points Michelangelo11 | 1 comments | 27 Aug 25 11:38 UTC | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
yellow_lead ◴[27 Aug 25 12:24 UTC] No.45038691[source]▶
> Five engineers participated in the call, including a senior software engineer, a flight safety engineer and three specialists in landing gear systems, the report said.

I can't imagine the stress of being on this call as an engineer. It's like a production outage but the consequences are life and death. Of course, the pilot probably felt more stressed.

replies(9): >>45039254 #>>45039282 #>>45039409 #>>45039651 #>>45040107 #>>45040566 #>>45040768 #>>45041007 #>>45044206 #
airstrike ◴[27 Aug 25 13:29 UTC] No.45039409[source]▶
I don't think there was ever a risk of the plane crashing with the pilot still in the cockpit, despite the fact that the headline sort of leads people to that conclusion.

The pilot could eject at any time. Still dangerous, but more of a debugging session to avoid other similar costly in the future than a Hollywood-like "if we don't solve this now the pilot dies"

replies(4): >>45039579 #>>45039607 #>>45039722 #>>45041508 #
codyb ◴[27 Aug 25 13:44 UTC] No.45039579[source]▶
Doesn't ejecting from a plane potentially break bones? I think it's pretty intense. Good on the pilot for doing the debug session
replies(3): >>45039701 #>>45040255 #>>45040677 #
HPsquared ◴[27 Aug 25 13:53 UTC] No.45039701[source]▶
I wonder if the ejection seat has different levels of acceleration depending on the situation.
replies(3): >>45040175 #>>45040578 #>>45040583 #
1. the__alchemist ◴[27 Aug 25 14:56 UTC] No.45040578{3}[source]▶
I've never heard of this, but I imagine it would only make sense as a manual override used explicitly for controlled-ejection scenarios. This incident was almost one of those, but turned into an uncontrolled one.