←back to thread

278 points Michelangelo11 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
greatgib ◴[] No.45038379[source]
[flagged]
replies(4): >>45038426 #>>45038535 #>>45038718 #>>45039492 #
tokai ◴[] No.45038426[source]
Not when the Danish Airforce use F35s.
replies(2): >>45038458 #>>45038576 #
nicce ◴[] No.45038458[source]
Or Finland…
replies(1): >>45038564 #
Temporary_31337 ◴[] No.45038564[source]
US can (effectively) shut down F35s remote.y
replies(1): >>45038596 #
rokkamokka ◴[] No.45038596[source]
A scary proposition considering what the US is rapidly becoming
replies(1): >>45038703 #
greenavocado ◴[] No.45038703[source]
Purchasing F35s is paying tribute to the empire so it doesn't come down on you harder with tariffs and compliance burdens. It's not meant to actually be useful.
replies(2): >>45038902 #>>45039299 #
guappa ◴[] No.45039299[source]
Yeah and the tariffs are still there anyway so I don't understand why we aren't following suite and cancelling those orders.
replies(3): >>45039444 #>>45039477 #>>45040125 #
1. nicce ◴[] No.45040125{4}[source]
Finland just joined NATO, which means that they lost their neutrality and independency for foreign politics. It is now very difficult to do something completely different or unfrienly than the U.S. because of that one country with shared border.

If the U.S really takes more steps towards taking Greenland and works against NATO ally, then it might be very complicated situation for both Denmark and Finland, and the whole alliance. But until then Finland at least is stuck with the U.S.