←back to thread

278 points Michelangelo11 | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
Molitor5901 ◴[] No.45038583[source]
Considering they relieved a pilot of command for ejecting when his F-35 become unresponsive, now they make them sit on conference calls. That pilot is very brave, I think others would have ejected by now. Making them fly around up there is ridiculous.
replies(4): >>45039343 #>>45039426 #>>45039456 #>>45039485 #
1. RankingMember ◴[] No.45039426[source]
Upon first reading the headline I was thinking it was some sort of test flight. Nope, poor guy was just trying to fly and ended up forced into a high-stakes troubleshooting tree while on a conference call, as if there's not enough on your mind in a fighter cockpit.

I don't know how many human-manned gens of aircraft are left, but my first inclination is to think a remote-control fallback option wouldn't be out of line here if the security could be done right.

replies(2): >>45040131 #>>45045590 #
2. lazide ◴[] No.45040131[source]
Honestly, an override switch was all they needed. The problem is they went all digital and didn’t have one.
3. nradov ◴[] No.45045590[source]
Remote control for what? That doesn't really help in the case of a serious mechanical failure.

There are probably several more generations of crewed tactical aircraft left. Autonomous flight control software is decades away from being able to handle complex missions and remote piloting can only work when you have secure, reliable, high-bandwidth communication links. The concept of operations for the next few generations will rely on manned/unmanned teaming where drones are sent forward to do most of the fighting and the manned aircraft hang back slightly but still within line of sight to act as control nodes.