Malicious versions of Nx and some supporting plugins were published

> Interestingly, the malware checks for the presence of Claude Code CLI or Gemini CLI on the system to offload much of the fingerprintable code to a prompt.

Can anyone explain this? Why is it an advantage?

Some AV / endpoint protection software could flag those files. Some corpo deep inspection software could flag those if downloaded / requested from the web.

The cc/geminicli were just an obfuscation method to basically run a find [...] > dump.txt

Oh, and static analysis tools might flag any code with find .env .wallet (whatever)... but they might not (yet) flag prompts :)

The malware is not delivering any exploits or otherwise malicious-looking code, so endpoint security is unlikely to flag it as malicious.

Furthermore most people have probably granted the node binary access to everything in their home directory on macOS. Other processes would pop up a permission dialog.

That’s because it’s new. Perhaps feeding prompts into Claude Code and similar tools will be considered suspicious from now on?