←back to thread

446 points talboren | 9 comments | | HN request time: 0.417s | source | bottom
1. futurecat ◴[] No.45039143[source]
GitHub Actions is such a pain to use just because of how sluggish it feels. I hope they’ll improve performance.
replies(3): >>45039419 #>>45039523 #>>45048887 #
2. Roark66 ◴[] No.45039419[source]
We used to use bitbucket Web hooks that used to trigger Jenkins jobs. This was almost instant. Now after migrating to GH actions it can take minutes before jobs start on push for example...
replies(1): >>45039585 #
3. blibble ◴[] No.45039523[source]
> I hope they’ll improve performance.

it's Microsoft, so the answer is: buy a new computer

(which comes with a bundled Windows license)

replies(2): >>45039554 #>>45039625 #
4. futurecat ◴[] No.45039554[source]
yeah I'll keep my M3
5. simooooo ◴[] No.45039585[source]
How big are these jobs? I’ve never seen an action take more than 15s to start
6. layer8 ◴[] No.45039625[source]
We are at a point where buying a new computer doesn’t actually help.
7. wheybags ◴[] No.45048887[source]
It also continuously fails to scroll down in the log view when watching output of a ci job live, and has done for years. It's so annoying that I made a userscript to force scrolling: https://github.com/wheybags/userscripts/blob/main/github_act...
replies(1): >>45049830 #
8. futurecat ◴[] No.45049830[source]
I feel you. The UX is a gigantic mess. Navigating between jobs and builds is also a terrible experience.
replies(1): >>45050361 #
9. wheybags ◴[] No.45050361{3}[source]
Oh man. Start a manual job, wait for it to appear in the UI. 10 minutes later, it finally appears. Or just refresh the page manually immediately after starting the job, and there it is...