←back to thread

278 points Michelangelo11 | 5 comments | | HN request time: 0.61s | source
1. voidUpdate ◴[] No.45038504[source]
> "they likely would have advised a planned full stop landing or a controlled ejection instead of a second touch-and-go"

Is that not what the pilot did anyway? Or is a "controlled ejection" different from what they did?

replies(3): >>45038524 #>>45038542 #>>45038550 #
2. the_real_cher ◴[] No.45038524[source]
I had the exact same thought.
3. fabian2k ◴[] No.45038542[source]
The article mentioned that the aircraft become uncontrollable once it thought it was on the ground and switched control modes. And then the pilot ejected.

I assume a controlled ejection would have been during controlled flight at a time and location specifically chosen. This ejection was necessary because the plane was uncontrollable in the end.

replies(1): >>45038604 #
4. lentil_soup ◴[] No.45038550[source]
If I understood correctly, the ejection came after the second touch and go made the plane go into landed mode which made it impossible to fly anymore
5. voidUpdate ◴[] No.45038604[source]
Ah, I see, ejection in a controlled situation instead of "oh no, time to go now"