←back to thread

298 points Teever | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
kevinmershon ◴[] No.45032976[source]
> This is a similar reaction to photosynthesis in plants, which produces glucose instead of rocket fuel.

This is silly, but also begs the sillier question why we aren't bioengineering plants to produce rocket fuel

replies(13): >>45033082 #>>45033402 #>>45033527 #>>45034799 #>>45035729 #>>45035794 #>>45035914 #>>45036480 #>>45036510 #>>45037005 #>>45037021 #>>45038060 #>>45052243 #
andrewflnr ◴[] No.45033082[source]
Why aren't we engineering plants to produce automotive fuel? We ought to at least be able to do diesel.
replies(14): >>45033143 #>>45033153 #>>45033209 #>>45033372 #>>45033429 #>>45033480 #>>45033645 #>>45034388 #>>45034399 #>>45035296 #>>45035708 #>>45035938 #>>45037003 #>>45037073 #
dr_dshiv ◴[] No.45033429[source]
Over 1% of US land is devoted to biofuels. If we replaced those corn fields with solar, it would produce 4x the electricity currently consumed in the US.
replies(2): >>45033538 #>>45034034 #
fooker ◴[] No.45034034[source]
Sure if we could magically transport and store it. Like we can for liquid fuels.
replies(2): >>45038350 #>>45038923 #
1. jameshart ◴[] No.45038350{3}[source]
Magically transporting and storing liquid fuels involves an unbelievably massive supply chain of trucks and refineries and storage tanks and gas stations.

If we need infrastructure to make use of energy we can ‘magic’ it up.