←back to thread

400 points ingve | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
beardyw ◴[] No.45036335[source]
I know I risk being down voted remorselessly but I have to put this in context. Where in the real world is anonymity considered ok? If I only put a flyer through someone's letterbox here in the UK, I have to identify myself. If I sell a physical product I not only have to identify myself but take on serious legal liability. An author can take on a pseudonym but only via an identified publisher.

In fact that latter example might provide a solution. Set up a company willing to publish apps whilst hiding the actual developer's identity.

replies(8): >>45036356 #>>45036377 #>>45036415 #>>45036449 #>>45036469 #>>45036482 #>>45036516 #>>45036602 #
johnnyfaehell ◴[] No.45036356[source]
The thing is that so many people are used to doing whatever they want from behind the safety of their screen and are now able to do a lot of things they don’t want anyone to know about. Now the law and common sense is catching up and we’re starting to see things we take for granted in the physical world are coming to the digital world. And I think a lot of people are scared of not being able to do what they used to or being found out for doing it.

Plus, and doing what you suggest but in a country where board directors don’t need to be public really solves it.

replies(2): >>45036845 #>>45038304 #
1. Hizonner ◴[] No.45038304[source]
> Now the law and common sense is catching up and we’re starting to see things we take for granted in the physical world are coming to the digital world.

Your concept of "common sense" is repulsive, as is your submissive attitude.

replies(1): >>45053358 #
2. johnnyfaehell ◴[] No.45053358[source]
Haha yea me disagreeing with folks like you is submissive