←back to thread

Claude for Chrome

(www.anthropic.com)
795 points davidbarker | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.583s | source
Show context
aliljet ◴[] No.45030980[source]
Having played a LOT with browser use, playwright, and puppeteer (all via MCP integrations and pythonic test cases), it's incredibly clear how quickly Claude (in particular) loses the thread as it starts to interact with the browser. There's a TON of visual and contextual information that just vanishes as you begin to do anything particularly complex. In my experience, repeatedly forcing new context windows between screenshots has dramatically improved the ability for claude to perform complex intearctions in the browser, but it's all been pretty weak.

When Claude can operate in the browser and effectively understand 5 radio buttons in a row, I think we'll have made real progress. So far, I've not seen that eval.

replies(7): >>45031153 #>>45031164 #>>45031750 #>>45032251 #>>45033961 #>>45034552 #>>45036980 #
MattSayar ◴[] No.45031164[source]
Same. When I try to get it to do a simple loop (eg take screenshot, click next, repeat) it'll work for about five iterations (out of a hundred or so desired) then say, "All done, boss!"

I'm hoping Anthropic's browser extension is able to do some of the same "tricks" that Claude Code uses to gloss over these kinds of limitations.

replies(4): >>45031408 #>>45031587 #>>45031820 #>>45033874 #
CSMastermind ◴[] No.45031820[source]
This has been exactly my experience using all the browser based tools I've tried.

ChatGPT's agents get the furthest but even then they only make it like 10 iterations or something.

replies(1): >>45032034 #
rzzzt ◴[] No.45032034[source]
I have better success with asking for a short script that does the million iterations than asking the thing to make the changes itself (edit: in IDEs, not in the browser).
replies(1): >>45038063 #
1. seunosewa ◴[] No.45038063[source]
If you need precision, that's the way to go, and it's usually cheaper and faster too.