←back to thread

542 points xbmcuser | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.251s | source
Show context
nicolailolansen ◴[] No.45037035[source]
Anti-wind groups are oil-funded? Surprised Pikachu.
replies(3): >>45037306 #>>45037360 #>>45038382 #
dzhiurgis ◴[] No.45037306[source]
Why tho? Oil money should be funding renewables so they continue making money.
replies(7): >>45037354 #>>45037389 #>>45037582 #>>45037778 #>>45037823 #>>45038014 #>>45038419 #
tialaramex ◴[] No.45037823[source]
The whole point for them is ownership and while you can in effect own oil fields and these companies do, you don't own the wind -- the oil companies weren't smart enough/ early enough to persuade major governments to say oh, actually the wind belongs to BP and Exon.

So Hill Farmer Bob can just put a turbine up on the big hill and get "free" electricity. If there was magically Oil everywhere, and Bob was legally allowed to just drill for it, that's what he would obviously do, but in most places there is no oil and oil companies ensured they control the rights so Bob couldn't drill.

This is what capitalism is about, you own stuff therefore you get free money forever. But you don't own the sun or wind.

replies(1): >>45037867 #
1. actionfromafar ◴[] No.45037867[source]
Which is weird, because there's precedent for companies owning water rights. The step to owning wind rigths doesn't feel that far.

I'm wondering if the current governmental backlash to wind is just a prelude to getting "wind rights" of vast geographical areas sold to some properly bribing oil corporation.

Then the company can totally control the transition from oil to wind in such a fashion as to extract maximum revenue without having to care about any external competition.