←back to thread

443 points jaredwiener | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
pembrook ◴[] No.45036880[source]
This is dumb. Nobody is writing articles about all the times the opposite happened, and ChatGPT helped prevent bad stuff.

However, because of the nature of this topic, it’s the perfect target for NYT to generate moral panic for clicks. Classic media attention bait 101.

I can’t believe HN is falling for this. It’s the equivalent of the moral panic around metal music in the 1980s where the media created a hysteria around the false idea there was hidden messages in the lyrics encouraging a teen to suicide. Millennials have officially become their parents.

If this narrative generates enough media attention, what will probably happen is OpenAI will just make their next models refuse to discuss anything related to mental health at all. This is not a net good.

replies(4): >>45037768 #>>45038190 #>>45038209 #>>45039423 #
1. HPsquared ◴[] No.45037768[source]
Journalists and writers as a general class already have interests opposed to LLMs, and NYT in particular have an ongoing legal battle about copyright. Yes it's clearly dripping with bias.