←back to thread

542 points xbmcuser | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.2s | source
Show context
focusgroup0[dead post] ◴[] No.45037597[source]
[flagged]
1. SvenL ◴[] No.45037709[source]
Really, you take posts from x and YouTube for correct information? The x posts is just referencing other x posts and YouTube. Your YouTube link has 3 references in the description, the last two are 404 which means they probably got retracted.

Those mediums let arbitrary people post arbitrary non sense. Show me scientific studies, peer reviewed and published. And yes, even those can be bad, but at least I can read about their methodology how they conducted their study, the way they analyzed it, and then I can judge if it’s a good study.

Those links are borderline flat earth material.