←back to thread

400 points ingve | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
userbinator ◴[] No.45035952[source]
This shouldn't just be "questions"; this should be a full-on opposition. Do not give them even an inch, or they'll take a mile.

"debugger vendors in 2047 distributed numbered copies only, and only to officially licensed and bonded programmers." - Richard Stallman, The Right to Read, 1997

replies(5): >>45035983 #>>45036017 #>>45036375 #>>45037682 #>>45048988 #
teekert ◴[] No.45036017[source]
Why is it so complex to have a foss mobile OS.

I only have Linux PCs (laptops) and servers, 100% of my work and personal stuff is done there (though for work I do need to hop into MS365, Google Workspace, Zoom, etc, hooray for browsers, my final firewall between me and the walled gardens, though we can have a whole discussion on that).

For mobile, we have PostmarketOS, Phosh, Ubuntu Touch. I really must try living in them, is it on me? IDK, our government even has an identity app for iOS and Android. I should not be using it, I should stick to web. But its so much more convenient. I'm just weak, aren't I?

Maybe I should go for Ubuntu touch, with an iPad on the side or something. At least my most personal device is something I control then. Or just keep my Linux laptop handy (or make a cyberdeck!). But I want a computing platform that does not require carrying a bag. It's kinda sad. Even GrapheneOS (one of the most personal and secure mobile computing experiences out there)'s future is in the hands of its greatest adversary, the one that does not want you to have a personal computing experience.

replies(21): >>45036070 #>>45036112 #>>45036243 #>>45036360 #>>45036380 #>>45036382 #>>45036412 #>>45036460 #>>45036478 #>>45036483 #>>45036501 #>>45036535 #>>45036675 #>>45036711 #>>45036838 #>>45037138 #>>45037190 #>>45037762 #>>45040244 #>>45041234 #>>45046932 #
mac-mc ◴[] No.45036243[source]
It's pretty obvious, it's costly to make one that is up to the level of quality of commercial ones. It's not a mistake that the 2 mobile oses are owned and created by some of the largest and most profitable companies in the world.
replies(1): >>45036693 #
1. shermantanktop ◴[] No.45036693[source]
It’s costly, but those two companies also operate in a hierarchical manner (like the military or a feudal kingdom) which makes decision-making and accountability much easier. The FOSS world has been rife with petty agree-or-fork squabbles, often over relatively abstract philosophical concerns about license language.
replies(2): >>45036819 #>>45037113 #
2. wolvesechoes ◴[] No.45036819[source]
> The FOSS world has been rife with petty agree-or-fork squabbles, often over relatively abstract philosophical concerns about license language.

You cannot say that. This means we have thousand half-baked projects to choose from, and choice is good. At least this is what I was told.

3. PeterStuer ◴[] No.45037113[source]
Look inside the kitchen of Microsoft or Google. It is comparable to all the FOSS world petty squables and pfiefdom wars.

You can even see this into the abominal products they release, rife with frankesteinian cobbled together bits and pieces from different 'orgs' trying to grab a piece of the (tr)action and the wild inconsistencies in the UX.