←back to thread

301 points pseudolus | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
p1mrx ◴[] No.45029734[source]
> it is expected to generate about 880,000 kilowatt hours of electricity each year

100 kW, in sensible units.

replies(6): >>45029865 #>>45030191 #>>45036621 #>>45036746 #>>45037007 #>>45040915 #
throwawaysoxjje ◴[] No.45029865[source]
*An average of 100kW assuming 100% duty cycle.
replies(1): >>45030296 #
hinkley ◴[] No.45030296[source]
Expecting it to operate most of the time is a safer bet than expecting it to have a peak output that’s substantially higher than the average. It’s be smart to try to align it with power usage, but in truth it’ll lag behind peak water usage by however long it takes to top off the tanks. I don’t know when that is but I would suspect before morning rush hour.

Probably this thing peaks at 120-150KW which isn’t going to fix the grid.

replies(2): >>45032079 #>>45034534 #
tempestn ◴[] No.45032079[source]
It's going to partially offset the power usage (and the effluent brine) of the desalination plant that feeds it.
replies(1): >>45033821 #
thfuran ◴[] No.45033821{3}[source]
A few percent of it, probably. 150 kw is peanuts for grid power generation and desalination is fairly power hungry.
replies(1): >>45036019 #
1. Scoundreller ◴[] No.45036019{4}[source]
I’ll take the 150 kw if you won’t