←back to thread

364 points metalman | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.53s | source
Show context
Pigalowda ◴[] No.45033827[source]
So the starlink simulators its deploying right now are empty platters that will burn up in the atmosphere from what I understand. Next missions they’ll be real statlink sats. Are these different than regular sats? It sounds like they’re able to handle more bandwidth but I don’t know.
replies(3): >>45033853 #>>45033872 #>>45034212 #
1. decimalenough ◴[] No.45033872[source]
Starship will be deploying the next gen v3 satellites, which weigh about 2 tons each. A single Starship launch with 60 of these deploys more capacity than 20 launches of a Falcon 9.
replies(3): >>45034471 #>>45034938 #>>45035517 #
2. xeromal ◴[] No.45034471[source]
Wow, that really puts it into perspective
3. Pedro_Ribeiro ◴[] No.45034938[source]
The figures they've been talking of the ideal cost per launch of starship are even more insane. I'm sure some of it is hype farming on Twitter but if they get the cost to less then $1000/kg it would be incredible.
4. geerlingguy ◴[] No.45035517[source]
IIRC the v3 sats can do like 1 Tbps of bandwidth thanks to a larger antenna system?