←back to thread

Claude for Chrome

(www.anthropic.com)
795 points davidbarker | 1 comments | 26 Aug 25 19:01 UTC | HN request time: 0.225s | source
Show context
mrs6969 ◴[26 Aug 25 20:28 UTC] No.45031926[source]▶
I don’t know if this will make anything better.

Internet is now filled with ai generated text, picture or videos. Like we havent had enough already, it is becaming more and more. We make ai agents to talk to each other.

Someone will make ai to generate a form, many other will use ai to fill that form. Even worst, some people will fill millions of forms in matter of second. What is left is the empty feeling of having a form. If ai generates, and fills, and uses it, what good do we have having a form?

Feel like things get meaningless when ai starts doing it. Would you still be watching youtube, if you knew it is fully ai generated, or would you still be reading hackernews, if you know there not a single human writing here?

replies(6): >>45032058 #>>45032158 #>>45032397 #>>45032583 #>>45032624 #>>45033794 #
ares623 ◴[26 Aug 25 20:42 UTC] No.45032058[source]▶
Some of us won’t. But a majority probably will.

Even more important, the kids of today won’t care. Their internet will be fully slopped.

And with outdoor places getting more and more rare/expensive, they’ll have no choice but to consume slop.

replies(3): >>45032211 #>>45032535 #>>45033840 #
1. SchemaLoad ◴[27 Aug 25 00:00 UTC] No.45033840[source]▶
The only solution I see is taxes going to fund outdoor in person spaces. As a society we very easily can afford these spaces, it's just that the people who need them most are the ones least able to pay for things.

Banning social media for kids alongside funding free or subsidised in person environments will be a huge benefit to society.