←back to thread

443 points jaredwiener | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.208s | source
Show context
nis0s ◴[] No.45032298[source]
Why did developers spread the idea of AI consciousness for LLMs in the first place? The usefulness and capability of an LLM is orthogonal to its capacity to develop consciousness.

I think people would use LLMs with more detachment if they didn’t believe there was something like a person in them, but they would still become reliant on them, regardless, like people did on calculators for math.

replies(9): >>45032597 #>>45032598 #>>45033263 #>>45033321 #>>45033633 #>>45036683 #>>45036748 #>>45037522 #>>45037596 #
1. slipperydippery ◴[] No.45033633[source]
Altman needed to convince companies these things were on the verge of becoming a machine god, and their companies risked being left permanently behind if they didn’t dive in head-first now. That’s what all the “safety” stuff was and why he sold that out as soon as convenient (it was never serious, not for him, it was a sales tactic to play up how powerful his product might be) so he could get richer. He’s a flim-flam artist. That’s his history, and it’s the role he’s playing now.

And a lot of people who should have known better, bought it. Others less well-positioned to know better, also bought it.

Hell they bought it so hard that the “vibe” re: AI hype on this site has only shifted definitely against it in the last few weeks.