←back to thread

Gemini 2.5 Flash Image

(developers.googleblog.com)
1092 points meetpateltech | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.002s | source
Show context
notsylver ◴[] No.45027765[source]
I digitised our family photos but a lot of them were damaged (shifted colours, spills, fingerprints on film, spots) that are difficult to correct for so many images. I've been waiting for image gen to catch up enough to be able to repair them all in bulk without changing details, especially faces. This looks very good at restoring images without altering details or adding them where they are missing, so it might finally be time.
replies(6): >>45028087 #>>45028089 #>>45028096 #>>45028100 #>>45028616 #>>45029813 #
bjackman ◴[] No.45029813[source]
I don't really understand the point of this usecase. Like, can't you also imagine what the photos might look like without the damage? Same with AI upscaling in phone cameras... if I want a hypothetical idea of what something in the distance might look like, I can just... imagine it?

I think we will eventually have AI based tools that are just doing what a skilled human user would do in Photoshop, via tool-use. This would make sense to me. But just having AI generate a new image with imagined details just seems like waste of time.

replies(4): >>45030769 #>>45030991 #>>45033550 #>>45041728 #
1. bibabaloo ◴[] No.45033550[source]
Why take photos at all if you can just imagine them?
replies(1): >>45036162 #
2. bjackman ◴[] No.45036162[source]
Well, that goes to the heart of my point. I take pictures because I value how literal they are. I enjoy the fact that they directly capture the arrangement of light in the moment I took them. That

So yeah, if I'm gonna then upscale them or "repair" them using generative AI, then it's a bit pointless to take them in the first place.