←back to thread

298 points Teever | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.257s | source
Show context
monster_truck ◴[] No.45032447[source]
This is from January, have there been any updates in the past 7 months?

There is exceptionally little material info in this article and so very much speculation

replies(2): >>45033045 #>>45033391 #
nashashmi ◴[] No.45033045[source]
Apparently it has been in production since 2015. Why is this the first we are hearing about it?
replies(2): >>45033312 #>>45033343 #
1. grues-dinner ◴[] No.45033312[source]
Chinese scientific progress relatively rarely gets reported on because nearly all science reporting is a push-based system of institutions throwing press releases at publications. The publications don't have the chops to analyse or verify that information, or to go and find interesting research happening on their own, so they mostly stick with uncritically repackaging output from the places they trust.