←back to thread

360 points danielmorozoff | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
devinprater ◴[] No.45030311[source]
I'll let other blind people go first, but I'm definitely some one that would love, love, love to be able to see. Driving, knowing body language, playing any and every video game out there, shoot yeah!
replies(5): >>45031652 #>>45033075 #>>45033401 #>>45036614 #>>45042698 #
BrandoElFollito ◴[] No.45031652[source]
Why would you not go first? If you are blind it cannot be worse (well it can, but there are always risks).

My wife went through semi-expetimental therapy (at that time) for her MS. It was tough but ultimately a net benefit.

It all depends on what is at stake - I would consider Ozempic for some weight loss but prefer, for now, go for no sugar and moderate portions. This is not life changing for me so I indeed prefer people who will benefit way more from it to go first.

replies(7): >>45032000 #>>45032119 #>>45032332 #>>45032362 #>>45032443 #>>45033938 #>>45036991 #
justin66 ◴[] No.45032362[source]
> If you are blind it cannot be worse

Holy moly.

replies(1): >>45033031 #
fracus ◴[] No.45033031[source]
I think it was obvious they meant the condition of blindness cant't be worse.
replies(3): >>45033139 #>>45035965 #>>45049822 #
1. jibal ◴[] No.45033139[source]
No, that's obviously not obvious, since the person you responded to thought otherwise.
replies(1): >>45047744 #
2. fracus ◴[] No.45047744[source]
"I" think was obvious
replies(1): >>45048316 #
3. jibal ◴[] No.45048316[source]
And you are wrong, as noted. If you mean "it was obvious to me", that's a different matter ... but it's also irrelevant.
replies(1): >>45056099 #
4. fracus ◴[] No.45056099{3}[source]
It isn't always pragmatic to account for the 5% of people who misinterpret what is being said or who aren't able to contextualize because they are stupid. We've all misinterpreted obvious things before. It isn't that big of a deal.