←back to thread

360 points danielmorozoff | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.216s | source
Show context
devinprater ◴[] No.45030311[source]
I'll let other blind people go first, but I'm definitely some one that would love, love, love to be able to see. Driving, knowing body language, playing any and every video game out there, shoot yeah!
replies(5): >>45031652 #>>45033075 #>>45033401 #>>45036614 #>>45042698 #
BrandoElFollito ◴[] No.45031652[source]
Why would you not go first? If you are blind it cannot be worse (well it can, but there are always risks).

My wife went through semi-expetimental therapy (at that time) for her MS. It was tough but ultimately a net benefit.

It all depends on what is at stake - I would consider Ozempic for some weight loss but prefer, for now, go for no sugar and moderate portions. This is not life changing for me so I indeed prefer people who will benefit way more from it to go first.

replies(7): >>45032000 #>>45032119 #>>45032332 #>>45032362 #>>45032443 #>>45033938 #>>45036991 #
crote ◴[] No.45032332[source]
It's a brain chip. How do you feel about being blind and paralyzed? Or comatose? Or dead? How about never-ending pain or constant bright flashes? What if they go bankrupt, and something happens to the implant?

Brain surgery isn't exactly an industry where "move fast and break things" is an acceptable approach - especially when you are the patient. Considering Neuralink's historical record, going first sounds like a horrible idea to me.

replies(4): >>45032736 #>>45032771 #>>45033306 #>>45035960 #
1. snerbles ◴[] No.45032771[source]
Also seizures, personality changes and myriad forms of cognitive impairment.

The 20 years of US adventures in Iraq & Afghanistan led to many traumatic brain injury cases analyzed by modern medicine, and the chronic symptoms are worse than one might think.