←back to thread

360 points danielmorozoff | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.223s | source
Show context
NitpickLawyer ◴[] No.45002721[source]
There is a great podcast with the entire team + Noland on yt. It is ~ 8h long, but IMO it's worth the time. You get to hear things from the perspective of the chief brain surgeon, hardware team, software team, and of course Noland himself. I really recommend it, to get a better understanding of what's possible, what they had to do to get there, and how impactful this kind of research is for people with terrible conditions.
replies(3): >>45031352 #>>45032352 #>>45035688 #
Veserv ◴[] No.45032352[source]
Still the same depraved head of neurosurgery, Dr. Matthew MacDougall, who said: "If tomorrow laws were changed and the FDA said okay you can do some of this early experimentation in willing human participants that would be a very interesting option I think there would be a lot of people that would step up." [1]

That is basically the textbook definition of unethical medical practice, so unquestionably far over the line of acceptable practice that you would have to be willfully ignorant to defend it, and they think it would be exciting if it were not banned.

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ZGItIAUQmI&t=5239s

replies(6): >>45032566 #>>45032662 #>>45032718 #>>45033183 #>>45035240 #>>45037056 #
1. kridsdale3 ◴[] No.45032566[source]
Who are you to decide what is acceptable? This type of moral system is entirely cultural.