←back to thread

Claude for Chrome

(www.anthropic.com)
795 points davidbarker | 1 comments | 26 Aug 25 19:01 UTC | HN request time: 0.233s | source
Show context
mrs6969 ◴[26 Aug 25 20:28 UTC] No.45031926[source]▶
I don’t know if this will make anything better.

Internet is now filled with ai generated text, picture or videos. Like we havent had enough already, it is becaming more and more. We make ai agents to talk to each other.

Someone will make ai to generate a form, many other will use ai to fill that form. Even worst, some people will fill millions of forms in matter of second. What is left is the empty feeling of having a form. If ai generates, and fills, and uses it, what good do we have having a form?

Feel like things get meaningless when ai starts doing it. Would you still be watching youtube, if you knew it is fully ai generated, or would you still be reading hackernews, if you know there not a single human writing here?

replies(6): >>45032058 #>>45032158 #>>45032397 #>>45032583 #>>45032624 #>>45033794 #
ares623 ◴[26 Aug 25 20:42 UTC] No.45032058[source]▶
Some of us won’t. But a majority probably will.

Even more important, the kids of today won’t care. Their internet will be fully slopped.

And with outdoor places getting more and more rare/expensive, they’ll have no choice but to consume slop.

replies(3): >>45032211 #>>45032535 #>>45033840 #
1. bpt3 ◴[26 Aug 25 20:55 UTC] No.45032211[source]▶
> And with outdoor places getting more and more rare/expensive, they’ll have no choice but to consume slop.

What does this mean? Cities and other places where real estate is expensive still have public parks, and outdoor places are not getting more expensive elsewhere.

They also have numerous other choices other than "consume whatever is on the internet" and "go outside".

I don't think anyone benefits from poorly automated content creation, but I'm not this resigned to its impact on society.