←back to thread

Claude for Chrome

(www.anthropic.com)
795 points davidbarker | 7 comments | 26 Aug 25 19:01 UTC | HN request time: 0.839s | source | bottom
1. Yeroc ◴[26 Aug 25 19:13 UTC] No.45030893[source]▶
Most browser extensions you need to manually enable in incognito mode. This is an extension that should be disabled in normal mode and only enabled in incognito mode!
replies(3): >>45030982 #>>45032534 #>>45033053 #
2. layman51 ◴[26 Aug 25 19:19 UTC] No.45030982[source]▶
In my opinion, if it shouldn’t be enabled in normal mode, it certainly shouldn’t be enabled in Incognito Mode either where it will give you a false sense of security.
replies(1): >>45031295 #
3. darknavi ◴[26 Aug 25 19:39 UTC] No.45031295[source]▶
Perhaps an excuse for a new "mode". Or using something like Firefox containers to keep it in its own space.
4. nicce ◴[26 Aug 25 21:27 UTC] No.45032534[source]▶
Rather completely different browser, and in the sandbox.
5. mkl ◴[26 Aug 25 22:17 UTC] No.45033053[source]▶
Just make a separate browser profile for it. That's easy in Chrome.
replies(1): >>45034234 #
6. dotproto ◴[27 Aug 25 00:59 UTC] No.45034234[source]▶
Also pretty easy with Firefox's new profile manager https://support.mozilla.org/kb/profile-management
replies(1): >>45034951 #
7. mkl ◴[27 Aug 25 02:53 UTC] No.45034951{3}[source]▶
Oh, excellent. I use profiles in Firefox too, but it's been quite awkward in comparison.