←back to thread

360 points danielmorozoff | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
femiagbabiaka ◴[] No.45029594[source]
Have there been any reviews by independent experts? This reads like a promo piece, in particular I'm not sure why the fluff bits about Musk "being a regular guy" are relevant. Most of the linked sources are either other Fortune puff pieces or Neuralink press releases.
replies(6): >>45029687 #>>45029720 #>>45029783 #>>45029963 #>>45030098 #>>45030368 #
kevinpet ◴[] No.45029720[source]
Reviews by independent experts about the quality of this guy's life? I think he can be considered an authority on that subject.
replies(6): >>45029774 #>>45029797 #>>45029804 #>>45029912 #>>45029918 #>>45031497 #
micromacrofoot ◴[] No.45029797[source]
so are people who claim placebos and homeopathy improved their conditions, we are not reliable on an individual level
replies(3): >>45029836 #>>45029931 #>>45029978 #
zdragnar ◴[] No.45029836[source]
No placebo can let him "do things like play Mario Kart, control his television, and turn his Dyson air purifier on and off without physically moving his fingers or any other part of his body."

Given that there are objective changes, it is not unreasonable to believe his claim that he is satisfied or has benefitted from them.

replies(2): >>45030044 #>>45030499 #
1. micromacrofoot ◴[] No.45030499[source]
it's not objective when there's only a single reporter and it's the subject

no before/after video, no third party report, there's nothing here but puffery... half the article goes on to promote robots