←back to thread

360 points danielmorozoff | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.004s | source
Show context
femiagbabiaka ◴[] No.45029594[source]
Have there been any reviews by independent experts? This reads like a promo piece, in particular I'm not sure why the fluff bits about Musk "being a regular guy" are relevant. Most of the linked sources are either other Fortune puff pieces or Neuralink press releases.
replies(6): >>45029687 #>>45029720 #>>45029783 #>>45029963 #>>45030098 #>>45030368 #
kevinpet ◴[] No.45029720[source]
Reviews by independent experts about the quality of this guy's life? I think he can be considered an authority on that subject.
replies(6): >>45029774 #>>45029797 #>>45029804 #>>45029912 #>>45029918 #>>45031497 #
1. didibus ◴[] No.45029804[source]
I think a bit of skepticism is warranted here. Patient number 1 isn't some random guy getting the procedure and recounting it's benefits. But someone self-selected and willing from day 1, massively engaged with the company, likely paid or compensated, getting a lot of promotion, visibility and attention, etc.

It's possible a lot of the QOL improvements are from the circumstances of getting all that attention, or the hype circle they themselves found themselves in.

I also think people need to be open minded to the possibility Neuralink does offer promising benefits.

I'm just seeing a lot of people strongly for or against, and really I think the reasonable stance here is to remain optimistically pessimistic until further evidence.

replies(1): >>45029994 #
2. jstummbillig ◴[] No.45029994[source]
Let's be clear about what is a good subject for review and what is not. One person's opinion about how they feel is not. It can be a good subject for further inquiry, though: learn more about their experiences and consider critically whether those experiences generalize to others.