←back to thread

Gemini 2.5 Flash Image

(developers.googleblog.com)
1092 points meetpateltech | 6 comments | 26 Aug 25 14:01 UTC | HN request time: 0.004s | source | bottom
Show context
adidoit ◴[26 Aug 25 15:00 UTC] No.45027540[source]▶
Very impressive.

I have to say while I'm deeply impressed by these text to image models, there's a part of me that's also wary of their impact. Just look at the comments beneath the average Facebook post.

replies(5): >>45027591 #>>45027818 #>>45027979 #>>45028381 #>>45035261 #
knicholes[dead post] ◴[26 Aug 25 15:04 UTC] No.45027591[source]▶
[flagged]
kamranjon ◴[26 Aug 25 15:09 UTC] No.45027672[source]▶
Would you consider writing a blog post about this experience? I'm incredibly interested in learning more details about how this unfolded.
replies(3): >>45027943 #>>45029324 #>>45031009 #
1. qingcharles ◴[26 Aug 25 17:03 UTC] No.45029324[source]▶
I think the comment is a joke. Their bio is satirical at least :)
replies(2): >>45030186 #>>45030915 #
2. lucasmullens ◴[26 Aug 25 18:11 UTC] No.45030186[source]▶
I'm pretty sure the comment wasn't a joke? I saw the stream last week, it was very impressive use of AI, I didn't realize it was AI until he started talking about doubling crypto.

What about the bio is satirical? I'm pretty sure that's sincere too.

replies(1): >>45030762 #
3. qingcharles ◴[26 Aug 25 19:02 UTC] No.45030762[source]▶
User has edited their bio now :)
replies(1): >>45030960 #
4. nerevarthelame ◴[26 Aug 25 19:14 UTC] No.45030915[source]▶
Their bio mentions their actual job and one project that is verifiably real. I think that the elements that seem satirical are real projects they're working on.
5. knicholes ◴[26 Aug 25 19:18 UTC] No.45030960{3}[source]▶
I didn't edit my bio. My projects are not satire. I'm just less ashamed than most, so I work on more "exciting" projects. I've worked extensively with generative AI, including video, myself. It was just that convincing to me in the moment. My regret knows no bounds. Luckily I earn enough this doesn't devastate me, but I really could have done some good with that money.
replies(1): >>45031941 #
6. qingcharles ◴[26 Aug 25 20:29 UTC] No.45031941{4}[source]▶
Yikes. In that case, please accept my apology. Your bio disappeared for a while off your page, but it's back as it was now.