←back to thread

Gemini 2.5 Flash Image

(developers.googleblog.com)
1092 points meetpateltech | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
adidoit ◴[] No.45027540[source]
Very impressive.

I have to say while I'm deeply impressed by these text to image models, there's a part of me that's also wary of their impact. Just look at the comments beneath the average Facebook post.

replies(5): >>45027591 #>>45027818 #>>45027979 #>>45028381 #>>45035261 #
knicholes[dead post] ◴[] No.45027591[source]
[flagged]
lionkor ◴[] No.45027633[source]
Not to victim-shame or anything, but that sounds more like more than one safety mechanism failed, the convincing tech only being a rather small part of it?
replies(2): >>45027774 #>>45031446 #
hansonkd ◴[] No.45027774[source]
I think the biggest failure is on the part of the companies hosting these streams.

Its been a while, but I remember seeing streams for Elon offering to "double your bitcoin" and the reasoning was he wanted to increase the adoption and load test the network. Just send some bitcoin to some address and he will send it back double!

But the thing was it was on youtube. Hosted on an imposter Tesla page. The stream had been going on for hours and had over ten thousand people watching live. If you searched "Elon Musk Bitcoin" During the stream on Google, Google actually pushed that video as the first result.

Say what you want about the victims of the scam, but I think it should be pretty easy for youtube or other streaming companies to have a simple rule to simply filter all live streams with Elon Musk + (Crypto|BTC|etc) in the title and be able to filter all youtube pages with "Tesla" "SpaceX" etc in the title.

replies(2): >>45027838 #>>45035219 #
lionkor ◴[] No.45027838[source]
I feel like somehow that would lessen it, but not really help much? There are obviously people with too much money in BTC who are trying to take any gamble to increase its value. It sounds like a deeper societal issue.
replies(1): >>45028931 #
1. jfoster ◴[] No.45028931[source]
You are right that they might never be able to get it to 0, but shouldn't they lessen it if a simple measure like the one described can prevent a bunch of people from getting fooled by the scam?