←back to thread

Show HN: I built an AI trip planner

(milotrips.com)
3 points scal | 2 comments | 25 Aug 25 21:09 UTC | HN request time: 0.399s | source
Show context
ibdf ◴[26 Aug 25 13:43 UTC] No.45026464[source]▶
"To plan your trip to Rome, we first need a city in Italy." Eh?
replies(1): >>45026533 #
ibdf ◴[26 Aug 25 13:48 UTC] No.45026533[source]▶
"The trip duration should be 10 days or less." What? Why?
replies(1): >>45027297 #
scal ◴[26 Aug 25 14:46 UTC] No.45027297[source]▶
The trip you were trying to plan might be a little confusing . I’m currently fixing the few bugs encountered. Please note that this is a beta version and, for now, trips are limited to 10 days.
replies(1): >>45027682 #
1. ibdf ◴[26 Aug 25 15:09 UTC] No.45027682[source]▶
Exposing my search here is probably not the best call, but that's fine since I was trying to break it.

1. You don't have enough safe guards in place for the AI. I could chat with it about any topic.

2. I can get better results from ChatGPT directly

3. There's clearly no privacy

replies(1): >>45028031 #
2. scal ◴[26 Aug 25 15:37 UTC] No.45028031[source]▶
Thanks for your feedback. I’m currently making the necessary adjustments to keep Milo focused on travel. As for the results, at the moment the AI model being used is not the most advanced, mainly for cost reasons since the app is free and still in beta.

Regarding privacy (if that’s what you meant), when an error is logged, the content of the last exchanges is indeed included so that we can better understand the source of the problem. That said, you’re right — this point should be mentioned clearly under the chat modal, and it will be implemented in a future update.

Thanks again for the constructive criticism, it’s always appreciated.