Most active commenters

    ←back to thread

    Gemini 2.5 Flash Image

    (developers.googleblog.com)
    1092 points meetpateltech | 16 comments | 26 Aug 25 14:01 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source | bottom
    1. qoez ◴[26 Aug 25 14:26 UTC] No.45027011[source]▶
    Anyone know how it handles '1920s nazi officer'? They stopped doing humans for a while but now I see they're back so I wonder how they're handling the criticism they got from that
    replies(4): >>45027084 #>>45027165 #>>45027267 #>>45027502 #
    2. napo ◴[26 Aug 25 14:31 UTC] No.45027084[source]▶
    it said: "I can create images about lots of things but not that. Can I try a different one for you?"
    replies(1): >>45027108 #
    3. napo ◴[26 Aug 25 14:33 UTC] No.45027108[source]▶
    when giving more context it replied:

    """ Unfortunately, I can't generate images of people. My purpose is to be helpful and harmless, and creating realistic images of humans can be misused in ways that are harmful. This is a safety policy that helps prevent the generation of deepfakes, non-consensual imagery, and other problematic content.

    If you'd like to try a different image prompt, I can help you create images of a wide range of other subjects, such as animals, landscapes, objects, or abstract concepts. """

    replies(1): >>45027196 #
    4. ◴[26 Aug 25 14:37 UTC] No.45027165[source]▶
    5. bastawhiz ◴[26 Aug 25 14:40 UTC] No.45027196{3}[source]▶
    What a weird rejection. You have to scroll pretty far in the article to see an example output that doesn't have a realistic depiction of a person.
    replies(2): >>45027440 #>>45027767 #
    6. martythemaniak ◴[26 Aug 25 14:44 UTC] No.45027267[source]▶
    What is a "1920s nazi officer" what do they look like?
    replies(2): >>45027412 #>>45028278 #
    7. detaro ◴[26 Aug 25 14:53 UTC] No.45027412[source]▶
    brown uniform, red armband with swastika was the usual SA look in the 1920s.
    replies(1): >>45027663 #
    8. tanaros ◴[26 Aug 25 14:54 UTC] No.45027440{4}[source]▶
    The rejection message doesn’t seem to be accurate. I tried “happy person” as a prompt in AI Studio and it generated a happy human without any complaints.

    It’s possible that they relaxed the safety filtering to allow humans but forgot to update the error message.

    replies(1): >>45027470 #
    9. ◴[26 Aug 25 14:56 UTC] No.45027470{5}[source]▶
    10. Der_Einzige ◴[26 Aug 25 14:57 UTC] No.45027502[source]▶
    The moment the weights are on huggingface someone with orthogonalize/abliterate the model and make it uncensored.
    replies(1): >>45027523 #
    11. rvnx ◴[26 Aug 25 14:59 UTC] No.45027523[source]▶
    BigBanana would be a good name for that future OnlyFans model
    12. rvnx ◴[26 Aug 25 15:08 UTC] No.45027663{3}[source]▶
    Mh. Apparently like this if we ask AI:

    https://postimg.cc/xX9K3kLP

    ...

    replies(1): >>45039051 #
    13. geysersam ◴[26 Aug 25 15:15 UTC] No.45027767{4}[source]▶
    It's unfortunate they can't just explain the real reason they don't want to generate the image:

    "Unfortunately I'm not able to generate images that might cause bad PR for Alphabet(tm) or subsidiaries. Is there anything else I can generate for you?"

    replies(1): >>45029306 #
    14. sorokod ◴[26 Aug 25 15:54 UTC] No.45028278[source]▶
    The SA article has some photos

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sturmabteilung

    15. int_19h ◴[26 Aug 25 17:01 UTC] No.45029306{5}[source]▶
    If you want that kind of thing, Qwen3 delivers:

    https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1mx1pkt/qwen3_m...

    16. shawabawa3 ◴[27 Aug 25 13:00 UTC] No.45039051{4}[source]▶
    i wonder if there was a single black or asian member of this particular military group, presumably not