←back to thread

US Intel

(stratechery.com)
539 points maguay | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
ModernMech ◴[] No.45026492[source]
I don't understand how they can say Democrats are Communists while they do this. It's going to be interesting hearing everyone who spent decades spilling volumes about the evils of communism and the failure of the USSR quickly pivot to being champions of state capitalism.
replies(5): >>45026676 #>>45026794 #>>45026815 #>>45026962 #>>45027586 #
empath75 ◴[] No.45026676[source]
I actually think the model here isn't communism, it's fascism/corporatism. They aren't nationalizing directly, they're intimidating private enterprises into compliance and cooperation.
replies(3): >>45026735 #>>45026830 #>>45026844 #
mc32 ◴[] No.45026830[source]
I think that's an incorrect framing. A more proper framing is that some industries are key to ensuring a nation is not dependent on another for key products that ensure a dominant (not supplicant like say Ukraine) position with regard to defence and therefore independence.

This is recognized by the current administration but is also a continuation of the previous administration's pivot toward undergirding and supporting key industries. I hope it's also recognized by any subsequent administration.

I think even neocons now recognize the "new world order" is not sustainable if some players don't play by the rules that they all agreed on.

No country with an ability to avoid it wants to be subject to being held by the neck.

replies(2): >>45026948 #>>45029810 #
1. slt2021 ◴[] No.45026948[source]
this sounds like the situation with the Krupp Corporation