←back to thread

Will Smith's concert crowds are real, but AI is blurring the lines

(waxy.org)
363 points jay_kyburz | 2 comments | 26 Aug 25 04:11 UTC | HN request time: 0.605s | source
Show context
petralithic ◴[26 Aug 25 09:31 UTC] No.45024248[source]▶
I'm not sure about this specific instance, but AI generated movies will absolutely be the future, when you can create the exact shots you want with stability of the foreground, background, and characters, and edit it all together, it'll be an explosion of creativity just as with image generation currently.

To be clear, I don't think it'll be telling an AI to "create me a movie with X, Y, and Z" because AI reasoning is not there yet, but for the raw video generation, it's progressing steadily, as seen in r/aivideo.

replies(5): >>45024291 #>>45024347 #>>45024498 #>>45024565 #>>45024606 #
postexitus ◴[26 Aug 25 10:24 UTC] No.45024606[source]▶
Nope. Limitations feed creativity. When you have unlimited power/reesources, you end up with unlimited slop. One of the reasons why old movies were better on average - now we get so many average movies with no lasting effect. Another one, slightly orthogonal - a golden ring or rolex in a neatly designed photo shoot vs a middle eastern head of state's "throne room". When you have something in limited quantities, you get the best out of it - when it's unlimited you go crazy.
replies(1): >>45025417 #
petralithic ◴[26 Aug 25 12:07 UTC] No.45025417[source]▶
Survivorship bias, there is no indication that older movies were better on average. While I can agree that constraints breed creativity as they say, the opposite can also be true; look at software, one can also theoretically code an unlimited number of things, and from that we get people creating software and connecting devices to a never before seen level of scale and creativity.
replies(1): >>45025744 #
1. postexitus ◴[26 Aug 25 12:41 UTC] No.45025744[source]▶
Agreed that technology opens up possibilities. If we continue on the movie analogy, moving from practical effects to CGI opened up possibilities - however it still had limitations (realism, uncanny valley, cost, render time etc.) - which pushed people to be strike a balance. However AI generated stuff gives you unlimited possibilities - whatever you imagine, becomes the scene. I recently saw a AI-augmented tourism video of a major tourist destination - it was vomit inducing. Of course, one may argue that it's just lack of art direction - same effect could be had with more traditional methods, but I still believe cost / possibilities constraints pushed people in the right direction. Maybe it's the luddite in me talking.
replies(1): >>45025987 #
2. petralithic ◴[26 Aug 25 13:05 UTC] No.45025987[source]▶
As always, there are some people with taste and most without. Just because the tools change does not mean one suddenly develops taste and creativity.

For example, I saw this the other day. Could it be better, sure, but it's at least interesting in itself.

https://www.reddit.com/r/aivideo/s/6EHgC29fvM