←back to thread

363 points jay_kyburz | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.634s | source
Show context
ulrikrasmussen ◴[] No.45022875[source]
I think AI-"upscaled" videos are as jarring to look at as a newly bought TV before frame smoothing has been disabled. Who seriously thinks this looks better, even if the original is a slightly grainy recording from the 90's?

I was recently sent a link to this recording of a David Bowie & Nine Inch Nails concert, and I got a serious uneasy feeling as if I was on a psychedelic and couldn't quite trust my perception, especially at the 2:00 mark: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Yyx31HPgfs&list=RD7Yyx31HPg...

It turned out that the video was "AI-upscaled" from an original which is really blurry and sometimes has a low frame rate. These are artistic choices, and I think the original, despite being low resolution, captures the intended atmosphere much better: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1X6KF1IkkIc&list=RD1X6KF1Ikk...

We have pretty good cameras and lenses now. We don't need AI to "improve" the quality.

replies(27): >>45022937 #>>45023020 #>>45023045 #>>45023060 #>>45023083 #>>45023097 #>>45023236 #>>45023265 #>>45023284 #>>45023337 #>>45023627 #>>45023822 #>>45023850 #>>45024004 #>>45024153 #>>45024192 #>>45024229 #>>45024335 #>>45024523 #>>45024569 #>>45024612 #>>45024842 #>>45025183 #>>45025320 #>>45025687 #>>45025996 #>>45027100 #
1. maplethorpe ◴[] No.45024842[source]
Your post just made me realise that as soon as the technology is ready, built-in AI upscaling will be just as ubiquitous as motion smoothing.
replies(1): >>45025280 #
2. incone123 ◴[] No.45025280[source]
Not sure if you're serious, but wouldn't it be more efficient to upscale at source and stream the result? Extra bandwidth versus a million TVs all doing the same computation.
replies(1): >>45026978 #
3. queenkjuul ◴[] No.45026978[source]
Yeah but that wouldn't let them slap AI on the TV box as a selling point