←back to thread

405 points Bogdanp | 10 comments | | HN request time: 1.031s | source | bottom
1. lh7777 ◴[] No.45021226[source]
Personally, I'm more dismayed by this change:

> Apps that haven’t been updated with Tahoe-compliant everything-fits-in-a-squircle icons are put in “squircle jail” — their non-Tahoe-compliant icons are shrunk and placed atop a drab gray Tahoe squircle background, to force them into squircle compliance.

I've been replacing some app icons with their older, non-square versions for years (Firefox is probably my favorite). Will be disappointing to lose that option -- I've never understood why Apple feels the need to standardize app icons like this.

replies(5): >>45021302 #>>45021623 #>>45021663 #>>45023880 #>>45031754 #
2. pasquinelli ◴[] No.45021302[source]
that is unfortunate. icons having a variety of silhouettes makes it easier to identify them and gives things a little personality.
replies(1): >>45025402 #
3. LoganDark ◴[] No.45021623[source]
I am in general quite dismayed with macOS becoming more and more iOS-like. There is a reason the two operating systems were different, and it was quite nice, to be honest. Not to say that I don't like sharing the liquid glass design language, but stuff like this this forced squircle is really sad to me, too.
replies(1): >>45021810 #
4. PlunderBunny ◴[] No.45021663[source]
I'd like someone running macOS 26 to weigh in here, but I'm not sure it's true that - if you replace an app icon (presumably by pasting in the Finder Get Info window) - the replacement is also confined to squircle jail?
replies(1): >>45027790 #
5. anonymars ◴[] No.45021810[source]
I feel like that's the crux of everything that sucks about computing these days: everything tending toward the lowest common denominator of a smartphone UI and a cheap whore of a webpage
6. ◴[] No.45023880[source]
7. silvestrov ◴[] No.45025402[source]
Adobe app icons are really the poster child for icons that are difficult to identify: https://as1.ftcdn.net/jpg/03/75/14/18/1000_F_375141824_Urr3G...

Icons were not meant to be text to read.

replies(1): >>45030747 #
8. InTheArena ◴[] No.45027790[source]
no.
9. kridsdale1 ◴[] No.45030747{3}[source]
Take a look at the icons for Google’s mobile apps.
replies(1): >>45037473 #
10. glitchdout ◴[] No.45037473{4}[source]
Oh, that redesign was ludicrous https://nathanboomsma.medium.com/why-googles-new-logos-suck-...