←back to thread

425 points sfarshid | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.62s | source
Show context
VincentEvans ◴[] No.45005596[source]
There will be a a new kind of job for software engineers, sort of like a cross between working with legacy code and toxic site cleanup.

Like back in the day being brought in to “just fix” a amalgam of FoxPro-, Excel-, and Access-based ERP that “mostly works” and only “occasionally corrupts all our data” that ambitious sales people put together over last 5 years.

But worse - because “ambitious sales people” will no longer be constrained by sandboxes of Excel or Access - they will ship multi-cloud edge-deployed kubernetes micro-services wired with Kafka, and it will be harder to find someone to talk to understand what they were trying to do at the time.

replies(16): >>45005632 #>>45005830 #>>45009697 #>>45009999 #>>45010075 #>>45010738 #>>45010794 #>>45011192 #>>45011626 #>>45011943 #>>45012386 #>>45013129 #>>45014577 #>>45014613 #>>45014836 #>>45015644 #
mr_toad ◴[] No.45014577[source]
A big part of the reason that people develop solutions in Excel is that they don’t have to ask anyone’s permission. No business case, no scope, no plan, and most importantly no budget.

Unless a business allows any old employee to spin up cloud services on a whim we’re not going to see sales people spinning up containers and pipelines, AI or not.

replies(3): >>45015299 #>>45019318 #>>45022014 #
zurtri ◴[] No.45019318[source]
So very true.

And then over time these Excel spreadsheets become a core system that runs stuff.

I used to live in fear of one of these business analyst folks overwriting a cell or sorting by just the column and not doing the rows at the same time.

Also VLOOKUP's are the devil.

replies(1): >>45020200 #
1. boppo1 ◴[] No.45020200[source]
Why also sorting by row? And why are vlookups the devil? my undergrad was finance, but I've self-learned a lot of CS.
replies(1): >>45022582 #
2. orand ◴[] No.45022582[source]
It's possible to sort just a single column, leaving all the columns beside it in their original sort order. That's very bad if you want to keep your rows in one piece.
replies(1): >>45045088 #
3. boppo1 ◴[] No.45045088[source]
Oh, duh yeah. That's such a natural thing to avoid I hadn't considered it