←back to thread

346 points Kye | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
favflam ◴[] No.45016762[source]
This situation feels dumb. I feel like I am watching idiots cheer on someone doing parkor and that person getting his teeth smashed on a wall. Like, what is the point?
replies(6): >>45016813 #>>45016814 #>>45016833 #>>45016847 #>>45016851 #>>45017297 #
philwelch ◴[] No.45016833[source]
De minimis allows people to evade tariffs by simply drop shipping each individual product all the way from China or wherever, so long as the retail price is below the threshold. I’m skeptical of tariffs in general but if you’re going to have them, it makes sense to close the loopholes.
replies(5): >>45016923 #>>45016951 #>>45016987 #>>45017041 #>>45018563 #
1. anigbrowl ◴[] No.45018563[source]
Baby, bathwater. For every person abusing it by splitting shipments (easily detectable and prosecutable) I'd bet there are many more taking their first small steps into entrepreneurship with goods or parts worth $100 or $500.
replies(1): >>45019877 #
2. philwelch ◴[] No.45019877[source]
Splitting shipments is different from drop shipping. Splitting shipments would be if, instead of moving a whole container of goods from a Chinese warehouse to a US warehouse, you just mail each item over by itself. Drop shipping is when you mail each item directly to the end customer.
replies(1): >>45035327 #
3. anigbrowl ◴[] No.45035327[source]
Yes, that's why I wrote 'splitting shipments'. I don't think drop shipments to a bunch of different customers should be tariffed, that's why the de minimis exception exists in the first place.